Talk:Gitanjali

India: West Bengal / Literature High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was last assessed in August 2012.

Poetry

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

It is wrongful to confuse Gitanjali, a poetry of 157 Bengali lyrics with Song Offerings of 103 poems collected from 11 books, inclduing Gitanjali, in English translaiton. Such an identification of Gitanjali is misleading for general readers.Faizul Latif Chowdhury (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-reference?

Does a cross-reference list exist, showing which texts are taken from which book? If so, could this be posted online somewhere, so that it can be linked here? In Dutch both the English and Bengali versions of the Gitanjali have been translated, and it's a bit confusing indeed, as both books have the same title, and it seems to me that only if you go deeper into it, you can find out the similaraties... Wiki-uk (talk) 11:08, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Section Poems contained copyvio from book "Critical Response To Indian Poetry In English", pp. 87-88. --Alex-engraver (talk) 07:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's mainly a poem has been quoted, do you mean the English text (1 line) and translation)? --Tito Dutta ✉ 11:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was not clear. I mean text I removed, see diff [1]. --Alex-engraver (talk) 17:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links urgently need work

I'm new to Tagore, and I read English but not any of the South Asian languages. I went to External Links in this article, but didn't find what I wanted. This link gives a Page Not Found error. Another link is ad-supported, and is to an English edition of Song Offerings; it has 103 poems, and the introduction by Yeats. However, the table of contents indicate that all of the poems are "Gitanjali", which those of you who know Tagore's work may find unsatisfactory. Wikipedia has a separate article "Song Offering" - I haven't yet studied it; I might find a decent working link there. Oaklandguy (talk) 03:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gitanjali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113162134/http://shilalekhbooks.com/geetanjali-by-tagore to http://shilalekhbooks.com/geetanjali-by-tagore/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]