Jump to content

Talk:Girls' Generation discography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listGirls' Generation discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 23, 2013Featured list candidatePromoted

Sales numbers

[edit]

I've looked at all the sales numbers, and its horrible - none of the sources are reliable (including allkpop) and not only that, the sources will flat out contradict what the discography states.

Can anyone find some real sources for the sales numbers, please? 21nolja 09:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cover use

[edit]

To. User:Esradekan

I think my material's satisfying the WP:NFC, WP:NFCC policy below.



In addition myself, following USA Law

Furthermore it can be cited from Copyright Act of South Korea, because these album covers are all in jurisdiction of Korean law.

Anyway I will explain about this case, all albums of the musical group don't have each article. Limited articles about special notable albums or songs can be created, but we have rights to get freely the information of their albums, songs including album covers as well as the other websites. No doubt about Wikipedia non-free content policy being polite, kindly, appropriate. Also I understand and respect it. However the matter you suggested, may not become trouble situations because the translation and application of law, rule, principle is some various in the allowed, limited extent. I think this case is no matter. These album covers what put in, are used just for indentifying them, very definately minimalized place of this page. You know, the images are not used for profit. Most album of the musical group don't have individual article page, you need to face it. Here article about "Discography" is a place concentrated from the musician's album information, sources being so far as to include the albums that don't have their own article pages. Discography articla page is a only space for the rest of their albums' images, various facts. I hope that you can see this case would not make problems.
-- Kookyunii (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images_2, where it says "an album cover as part of a discography, as per the above." There is no critical commentary on any of the covers and the covers belong in the albums page and not the discography page. Visit MOS:DISCOGS for a better understanding of what a discography page is for. MS (Talk|Contributions) 18:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reply: I (as much as I hate the word) assume you read WP:NFC instead of just cutting & pasting it here, because it seems to me you missed the bit in WP:NFC#Unacceptable use where it says, regarding album covers in a discography, that they are not allowed. You open your debate here by pointing us in the direction of WP:NFC & WP:NFCC. Please have a look at the discussion pages of those links, where you'll see your exact argument has been used to try and allow the use of album covers in a discography page, and has repeatedly been disallowed by users and admins alike per USA law. And on that note, Wikipedia is a registered company in the US, so is therefore subject to US copyright law, not Korean.
As a side note, I'm not going to get into further discussion over it here, because this has been going on for years, and was sorted ages ago, as you'll see when you have a looksie at the archived talk pages of those links you quoted. So I'll let them do the talking for me. However, I can point you in the direction of a few Administrators who will be able to answer any image rationale questions you may have. Just drop me a line. Cheers and Happy Editing.  Esradekan Gibb  "Klat" 00:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LG Cooky Music Video

[edit]

Hi! There is the 'Cooky' music viedo (advertisement of an LG Cyon mobile phone) released just a little while ago (details on the actual article) and I suggest it should be added in the singles section just like 'Chocolate Love' music video, made for advertisement of another LG Cyon mobile. Farjad0322 9 May 2010. Thanks in advance. :)

Promotional songs

[edit]

Most of the songs under Promotional singles are singles not promotional singles. Please edit back the page how it was before because Gee, Genie, The Boys etc were official singles not promotional songs. Penpaperpencil (Talk) 07:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sales Number 2

[edit]

I've checked sales number in Gaon chart on a monthly base (2011 & 2012, as 2010 only has final year numbers) and some numbers do not match with the yearly total. I suppose what should be more accurate is the final yearly numbers? For instance, number for The Second Album `Oh!`during 2011: Yearly number: 20588; per month sum: 21443. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.145.60.134 (talk) 13:27, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These sections don't belong here

[edit]

This section is about two compilation albums containing personal selections of j-pop and english pop by the group. This article is their discography, not for various artists.

Other albums

[edit]
Title Album information
Sweet Memories with Girls' Generation
  • Song selection album (Not sung by Girls' Generation)
  • Release: February 18, 2008
  • Label: SM Entertainment
  • Formats: CD
Heart 2 Heart with Girls' Generation
  • Song selection album (Not sung by Girls' Generation)
  • Release: March 17, 2008
  • Label: SM Entertainment
  • Formats: CD

This section describes "Photobooks". This is a discography, not a photobook-agraphy. This section could be moved to the main page, Girls' Generation, if necessary.

Photobooks

[edit]
Year Title Release date Sales
2010 Girls' Generation 1st Photobook in Tokyo June 2, 2010
2011 All About Girls Generation: Paradise in Phuket February 8, 2011
1st Japan Official Photobook: Holiday November 30, 2011 33,415+<ref>SNSD and 2PM's Photobooks ranks well in Quarter sales chart in Japan</ref>

As per WP:DISCOGSTYLE, I'm moving this to the talk page.

ps. It still appears on the article for now, because I'm still editing it. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 10:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Things taken off

[edit]

Previously, the discography also included guest appearances by members as either individuals or subgroups on other artists' recordings or on OSTs, CFs, etc. However, this is no longer present. Why was it taken off? Seemed relevant and I am sure people put in a lot of work creating it. It was very useful information! Can it please be put back on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtimpson (talkcontribs)

This is the discography for them as a group. For guest appearances individually or with other members, please see their individual pages under the section "Discography". Also please remember to sign your comments on any talk page with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 12:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why two Singles lists?

[edit]

There is two Singles lists, one with the title "Singles" and the other as "Other charted songs". Unless I am missing something here -- and I am pretty sure the wiki-article is the one missing something -- is there any justified basis for the two categories. If a song has charted, is it not thereby a single? Ought not these lists therefore be merged? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:41CD:3800:44BE:C123:53ED:76F5 (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Singles are individual releases separate from an entire album. They usually contain one or two songs, the A-side and B-side (except of course when it's a double A-side single). Almost every singles' chart charts per song, not single. This also includes songs that were released as part of another release, like track #5 or #8 on an album which were not released separately as a single. These are the songs under "Other charted songs". This is the style used with all major discographies. It also provides better comprehension by listing it separately. Also, please sign your comments on any talk Page with four tildes (~~~~) Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 13:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Korean Sales of Japanese albums

[edit]

Is there any source for the Korean sales of Girls&Peace and Love&Peace? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KweenSooyoung (talkcontribs) 15:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reissues section

[edit]

I do not believe that a separate reissues section would be beneficial for this page. Yes, Rihanna discography does have a separate section but keep in mind that that specific reissue actually has plenty of notable coverage to warrant its own article as compared to the reissues on this page, which don't. It might also be a tad confusing to see which album is a reissue of what, since they alternated the titles. Seeing as this version was the one accepted when the page was nominated for featured list status, it should be kept that way. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 06:17, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Raykyogrou0: But they have different rel. dates, chart pos as well as sales figures. Simon (talk) 08:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Korean charts seem to be counting the original release and the reissues as one album, so it doesn't make that much of a difference with regards to its charting positions or lack thereof. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 13:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Raykyogrou0: Not exactly. Oh! and Run Devil Run charted separately and had different sales figures according to source given. Simon (talk) 14:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm yes. But keep in mind that it is alone in that. The album's article already indicates that it charted separately (the refs should be updated btw), but is it absolutely essential to indicate that on the discography page within a separate section? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 07:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

[edit]

@Raykyogrou0: Not all website names are italicized. I don't think Oricon and Gaon are online magazines, newspapers, or news sites. Oricon Albums Chart and Gaon Music Chart do not have italics in the article titles. Random86 (talk) 00:31, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let me quote from WP:MOSTITLE: "Website titles may or may not be italicized depending on the type of site and what kind of content it features. Online magazines, newspapers, and news sites with original content should generally be italicized". Oricon and Gaon provide news with original content (the weekly charts and news articles), so they qualify. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 06:59, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Singles sales

[edit]

Could someone make a section for digital downloads for title and non-title tracks. I know that they are included on some individual song pages but many aren't or are outdated. It seems silly to have a dedicated section for chart positions, and a pretty scarce one at that, and not a section for digital downloads when many other acts such as EXO, Red Velvet, and F(x) have them for practically every track ever charted. Also, it would also be nice to update the Japanese singles section to include sales numbers and not just certifications, the former of which is completely absent from the last few releases, like many other discography pages. I noticed that there is a template advising users not to include the download figures, with no expiry date, yet many other pages do and therefore providemore reliable information about the artist's commercial performance. --EnderAtreides117 (talk) 07:53, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Noticed that the download figures removed, why does this not belong here when it adds plenty of value to the page and other pages are allowed to be added to and updated with no opposition, particularly big bang --EnderAtreides117 (talk) 09:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please look at the note at the top of the page when you click the "edit" button. This is a featured list on Wikipedia, so please keep it in line with the format of other featured discography pages. Thank you.--TerryAlex (talk) 14:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
EnderAtreides117 (talk · contribs) I don't understand. Which digital download chart positions are not included? I'm talking about songs which only charted on that chart and not any other chart. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 05:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Raykyogrou0 (talk · contribs) I don't understand. I was talking about how often each track was downloaded, not their chart positions.--EnderAtreides117 (talk) 06:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
EnderAtreides117 (talk · contribs) You're talking about sales figures. It has already been explained over and over why we don't include them here. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, which includes excessive listings of statistics like sales figures. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 06:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Girls' Generation discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
There was no discussion beyond the initial proposal. The pages were eventually redirected to Girls' Generation discography. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 06:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that the articles 2011 Girls' Generation Tour (album) and Into the New World (album) be merged into this article as per WP:NALBUMS: despite the fact that the two albums appeared on the Gaon Chart, there is barely any discussion about the two albums around the Web, and the topic is too narrow to cover. Simon (talk) 06:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Girls' Generation discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 45 external links on Girls' Generation discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reissues

[edit]

As Girls' Generation have released multiple reissues with separate chart positions and sales figures, I think it is necessary that a new section for "Reissues" be included. However since there may be debate on this topic I will leave it here in the Talk page and look forward to comments. — Simon (talk) 05:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Random86:, @Raykyogrou0: I want to hear from you guys. — Simon (talk) 16:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are referring to this?--TerryAlex (talk) 16:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@TerryAlex: Yes, that's right (also T-ara discography). — Simon (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Identity of Cho Yoon-sun article author

[edit]

We do not know for sure that Cho Yoon-sun, the former Minister of Culture, is the same as the author of the article on Girls' Generation, even though they share the same name; however, we do know that Cho Yoon-sun, the former Minister of Culture, does write up cultural articles for both magazines and the web, and that she was interested in female musical groups. The label after the author's name on the article 동아닷컴 기자 (donga.com reporter) might indicate that the two are not the same. --Bejnar (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Girls' Generation discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Girls' Generation discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sales figures for singles [update]

[edit]

I have added sales figures to singles as sales figures reflect how Girls' Generation are successful in South Korea, where certifications for digital singles are unavailable. Several discographies have also added sales figures for singles i.e. Mariah Carey and Katy Perry. — Simon (talk) 12:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Girls' Generation discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Girls' Generation discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Girls' Generation discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Singles table should be sorted by date

[edit]

Singles must be sorted by date, and should not be separated by the Korean or Japanese language. Please see example Shakira discography. She released English and Spanish language song and other artist in Wikipedia, they sorted the single by date same. So this must change same other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zealous37 (talkcontribs) 04:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zealous37: Please wait for consensus for such changes in future. Great; it's done at Shakira discography. That's not a policy or a guideline; it's just an example you're showing us because you think it should be like that. That's not the way it has to be. Ss112 20:58, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ss112: I began sorted by Language in many years ago. But I think this time, discography must be same other articles that must sort by date. Please add this policy because other Korean artist discography will almost use this discography to be a template. comment added by Zealous37)