Talk:Giovinezza/GA1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force ("GA Sweeps"), all old good articles are being re-reviewed to ensure that they meet current good article criteria (as detailed at WP:WIAGA.) I have determined that this article needs some work to meet current criteria, outlined below:
- All paragraphs need by definition at least three sentences; there are sections (such as the second "paragraph" of the lead) where this is not so.
- Sources need to be fully formatted, ideally using {{cite web}}, et al. There are missing fields in the references, and some are unformatted entirely (raw direct URLs).
- Some content in the lead does not appear in the article body, and I don't think the lead adequately summarizes the article currently (expanding the second paragraph could probably fix this).
- Terms a general audience would be unfamiliar with (blackshirts, who some of the people you discuss are) you be briefly introduced, i.e., "paramilitary blackshirts" or the like. You don't want to force people to link away from the page to understand it.
- What makes [1] a reliable source?
I am putting the article on hold for one week pending the address of these concerns. Please appraise me of progress here or on my talk. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 21:39, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time to review the article, but I will not be able to comply with this reassessment. I have limited time to spend on Wikipedia, and none of the above are a high priority to me. Feel free to delist the article; I will not be offended. Savidan 22:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
As no progress has been made by any party, I am delisting. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 18:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)