Talk:Gill (musician)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved to Gil Seong-joon. --BDD (talk) 21:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gil (entertainer) → Gil (rapper) – or alternatively Gil (Korean singer), Gil (Korean entertainer) or Gil Seong-joon. "Gil (entertainer)" is ambiguous and fails WP:DAB: the Brazilian singer Gilmelândia is also known as Gil, see album covers at pt:Categoria:Álbuns de Gil. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gil Seong-joon seems most specific, least awkward, and least likely to cause future conflicts. It also already exists, so there should be no controveray to the move. Its only downside is that he's not known by his last name, and some well-meaning editor might try to do another move to put it back, unless we place a DAB there, or to one of the other proposed names anyway. Prognostication is not a reason to fall back, though. Dovid (talk) 13:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Gil Seong-joon per the rationale above. Avoiding parenthetical disambiguation is good, and most other possible alternatives also have problems. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to "Gil Seong-joon", the current title Gil (entertainer) should be pointed to the disambiguation page. The suggested names "rapper" and "Korean singer" and "Korean entertainer" should be created as redirects -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know that the additional redirects are needed. Preemptive alternative disambiguation names? Whatever purpose they serve will probably be met my the DAB page itself. Dovid (talk) 18:01, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It will come up in the searchbox, if you don't know Gil's full name, you can access it through one of the redirects. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 00:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that's true, but how likely is it that when the search pulls up (entertainer) but not (rapper), (Korean singer), or (Korean entertainer), that the user will not find it? Dovid (talk) 13:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And if you don't know the person is a rapper? "Korean X" works better if so. And "entertainer" should not redirect here, given that the other Gil is also an entertainer. WP:CHEAP -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Further page move

I am not convinced that this one album cover is sufficient basis for the page move from the title agreed at RM. Before I move it back, may I have views please? Just Chilling (talk) 03:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BDD: Just Chilling (talk) 03:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is fine with me. I mostly just don't want to see (entertainer), per IIO's rationale in the RM. --BDD (talk) 13:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]