Talk:Giinagay Way/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Altnr1 (talk · contribs) 03:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
It's a good and interesting article. Should be one. I don't think it's a stub but instead a great article. Should be nominated.
Altnr1 (talk) 03:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Review
[edit]When I looked at it, it didn't have a table but now it does so a big yes because the table is complete and made in a way that editors can easily change and add things to the article.
Thevic1234 (talk) 04:44, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- I am going to quick-fail this article. It fails criteria 5 of the WP:GAC, which requires the article be stable. The article has been edited heavily over the last two days, and some additions seem to have been copyvios. I'm not saying it can never be a Good Article, but not right now. –Fredddie™ 04:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)