Talk:Gifts in kind

The page is repetitive and could use cleanup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.83.85.18 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 1 July 2009

I don't see how it's repetetive, but you're more than welcome to take a shot at improving it!

Waitak (talk) 22:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be merged with Payment in kind? TheCoffee (talk) 07:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gifts in Kind a bad thing for local economies

I was just reading an article at the csmonitor about misprinted Superbowl t-shirts being donated to Africa, specifically about gifts in kind being bad for the local economies where they're being sent. Should something be added here? Onlynone (talk) 16:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's certainly "bad GIK" and "good GIK". Global Hand has a series of standards that reputable gifts-in-kind organizations can apply to themselves to ensure that the things they give aren't harmful. To say that Gifts in Kind is bad for local economies is really a grossly unfair oversimplification of a complicated situation that people who do Gifts in Kind are very much on top of. Waitak (talk) 21:23, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gifts in kind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]