Talk:Gibanica/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dwaipayanc (talk · contribs) 02:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At its present form, the article is unlikely to pass GA.

The lead is not up to the mark, it fails to adequately summarize the article.
Why is L capitalized in Large vocabulary? Is it a specific publication?
There are also derivatives like Gibanicar... In which language?
the game named gibankanje: how is that related to the topic of this article?
the opening sentence of the second paragraph of Preparation ( Gibanica is a round shaped...) is problematic. The two ands in the sentence is not properly structured, perhaps some word or punctuation is missing.
the first sentence in History," ... It was first mentioned ... From the 17th century. " First mentioned from? Shouldn't it be first mentioned in?
and the first mention of the word was as a last name or nickname? How come it became a food? Is the last name still prevalent?
.. Because of this was applied for the Guineas... Wrong grammar.
In many instances, the prose quality, although not wrong, is not of good quality.--Dwaipayan (talk) 02:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A few of the issues have been addressed, but others remain. It would be greatly helpful for review purpose if nominator or other involved editors comment in this review page, updating us about the progress. Otherwise we might have to close this as a failure.--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this article was up for GAN, so I decided to copy-edit some of it. Tell me what you think. 23 editor (talk) 20:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You have addressed most of the issues, however, the lead needs to be more comprehensive.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the lead, and done some further copy-editing. 23 editor (talk) 00:36, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great work. In my opinion, this article meets GA criteria.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]