Talk:Giant leopard moth

is this the same as Hypercompe scribonia? See [1] Matt 14:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently so, according to [2]]

=)

Today I poked one of these (hoping it would show me it's abodomen so I could identify it, which it did) and it secreted two droplets of clear yellow liquid substance from the front of it's head. Is this moth "poisonous"? That's an interesting defensive behavior; at least, I've never seen a moth do that before.

sugarspidersilk@gmail.com (Gainesville, FL) Sugarspidersilk (talk) 01:28, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that too in Oklahoma City Oklahoma on May 18, 2010. What is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.37.189 (talk) 12:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: Two things:

1.) Yes, this moth, when anxious or threatened, secretes a fluid (sometimes described as "foul-smelling" from its thorax (not its mouth). It's normal, if that's what you experienced. (If something really did come out of your moth's mouth, though, it wasn't. Normal, I mean.) As far as I know, the fluid isn't poisonous for humans -- meaning that when I've touched it, nothing happened. No rash or any sort of pain whatsoever -- it's sort of like getting pooped on. Of course, I haven't ingested the stuff, so I don't know if it's deadly in that regard; but I wouldn't eat poop, either. :)

2.) Lots of people are nervous about touching the so-called "woolly" caterpillars, and this article mentions the possibility of the setae "breaking off" and "causing a rash." Again, in my experience, this has never happened, i.e., the little hairs on this particular caterpillar, if they have broken off in or around the skin of my hand, have never caused any sort of reaction. Some hairy caterpillars, I believe, are not safe to handle, but this one isn't one of them. Having said that, though, I don't recommend handling any caterpillar more than is absolutely necessary -- but I'd say the same thing about a baby bird, or a delicate plant, or your own eyeball.

That is all. Hope it helps. Sugarbat (talk) 05:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wooly bear or not?

A recent edit changed the article to remove the portion stating that this is not a wooly bear. However, if you follow the link to wooly bear, you get an article to Arctiidae, which family includes the Giant Leopard Moth, so it would seem it IS a wooly bear. This apparent contradiction needs to be resolved before the edit is remade (maybe link to something other than Arctiidae?). Victor Engel (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giant leopard moth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070615060834/http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3full/reprints/FullNapolDielAB.pdf to http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3full/reprints/FullNapolDielAB.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Range

Upon expansion this article needs a "Range" section. Otr500 (talk) 09:23, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]