Talk:Gia (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Vandi geia.jpg

Image:Vandi geia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Vandi gia.JPG

Image:Vandi gia.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sales/ certification

I'm sorry, but how can the sales of 200,000 copies (400,000 discs) be rewarded with 5x platinum, while Anna Vissi's "Kravgi" has sales of 175,000 copies (350,000 discs), but has been rewarded with the certification of 7x platinum (with the sales figures extracted from the same source)? I will change both articles, using the level of platinum used in Greece since 09/2009 (see: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/IFPI_Greece#Certification_levels ), meaning that "Kravgi" is more than 14x platinum, and "Gia" more than 16x platinum. If there is something wrong with this approach, then by all means, improve it. Use, however, the same standard for both albums, otherwise it doesn't make any sense at all anymore. --Robster1983 (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Issue resolved on your talk. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 13:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

5x and 200k versus 400k

We have two mostly conflicting sources for Gia.

This one from 2003 says it was certified 5x platinum for 200,000 units and portrays such sales as being very high for a country of 8 million people.[1]
This one from 2010 says that it sold 400,000 (units or discs it doesn't specify) and does not mention a certification level.[2]

Here is the issue, if it were to have sold 400,000 units in 2001, then it would have been certified 8 times platinum (since according to IFPI Greece in 2001 platinum=50,000), which is not the case here leading me to be skeptical about that source. It is most likely referring to the number of discs sold since it was a 2-disc album, but that seems random and irrelevant since you might as well count number of pages in the booklet, ounces of plastic in the case, etc. (Ok maybe that's extreme, but you get what I am saying). Since the certification level was reduced in 2002, I believe that the album was certified 5 times platinum during that period when the certification level for platinum was 40,000 units (5x40,000=200,000). Selling that many units so quickly in one year would have been impossible. Add to that the rerelease in 2002 and it makes much more sense. What does everyone think? Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 13:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Gia (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gia (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]