Talk:Ghoul (band)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal

Untitled

Dissector dosen't do vocals, please don't change the article to say otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.140.62 (talk) 04:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should thrash metal be on the genres list?

Some time ago, someone inserted "Thrash metal" into the genres list. I removed that with the edit summary "no point in having both deathrash and thrash metal". Someone reinserted it back with edit summary "There is [a point] when the band stops playing deathrash to focus on thrash metal and crossover." I still think this doesn't make sense. Is there any piece of music from this band (other than instrumental parts) which would be classified as Thrash Metal rather than Death/Thrash metal? I don't think so, first of all because of the vocals. Comments on this are welcome. Rbarreira 14:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Splatterthrash is a pure thrash album. The vocals are the ONLY death ,metal part of it. We came for the Dead was there only pure death album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.238.12.61 (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about goregrind? It is described as a sub-genre of death metal with lyrics that focus on gore and forensic pathology. Goregrind bands also don't usually take themselves too seriously. I think Ghoul fits this criteria perfectly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gypsysmoke (talk • contribs) 20:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

Do you think if we worked hard at it we could make the introduction sound a little bit more POV? It's not quite hagiographic enough for me at present :-). Blackmetalbaz (talk) 13:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghoul 02.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ghoul 02.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ghoul (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]