Talk:Ghoul (Dungeons & Dragons)

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Ghouls in popular culture
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Ghouls in popular culture

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2016. The result of the discussion was redirect to List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters (1974–76).

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Dungeons & Dragons Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Ghast

Article merged: See old talk-page for ghasts here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drilnoth (talk • contribs) 13:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too many sections

This article has way too many sections. It's positively ghastly. Does anyone watch this article? i kan reed 01:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol I agree. ··gracefool ☺ 06:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only three sections, but a lot of subsections. :) 71.194.32.252 (talk) 18:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the {{primary sources}} tag - as a fictional universe, is there any valid reference which couldn't be considered a primary source? It has no worse references than featured articles about the Simpsons. ··gracefool ☺ 06:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ghouls are ghastly

Article says the link between D&D ghouls and eating corpses "was probably derived from the popular connection of the word 'ghoul' with persons who delight in the unsavory." Ghouls from mythology are, among other things, corpse eaters. (66.229.247.48 (talk) 19:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]