Talk:Ghosthunter (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Ultra-violet light

How do you keep the ultra-violet light from the swamp to the prison? because there is no mention of how you accomplish this. unless these are the Spectral Goggles that you are reffering to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.72.126.105 (talk • contribs)

Actually, only in the PAL version (Europe) you can keep the ultra violet light. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.130.11.65 (talk) 19:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

The plot portion of this article is pretty poorly written. Way too many run ons. I would take a stab at it, but I've never actually played the game. I've added the tag, and placed a notice about this on another wikipedia page. Hopefully someone will help fix it. Galactor213 01:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a bash at correcting spelling and grammar, but haven't played the game either. dawkeye 01:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GhostHunter.jpg

Image:GhostHunter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More Info

This article has an uncomplete Plot section. It seems to have been written by someone who only finished the first part of the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.142.244 (talk) 01:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I rented the game and I just expanded the plot section. I hope this makes everyone happy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.207.32.37 (talk) 18:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Following things need to be done to this article

Check for notability.
Plot summery is way too long. A paragraph or three should be sufficient to get the gist.
Character section is too long. Boil it down to one or two sentences per character.
Weapons, Enemies and trivia section should be culled
Needs a Critical reception section to conform with style for game articles.

--Lendorien (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did many of the changes requested above. Still could use some expansion in critical receptions sections, sourcing and removal of the trivia section. --Lendorien (talk) 07:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are asking way too many changes! the article was fine the way it was! Since it is an article, the writer has the right to write eerything he desires! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.130.11.65 (talk) 19:12, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't work like that, Wikipedia has a series of policies, guidelines and standards which influence what information is presented and how it is presented. Someone another 23:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]