Talk:Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masud

Critical Source?

read this about the reality:

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=KtzT6k1d-NMC&pg=PA295&lpg=PA295&dq=Baharaich+ghazi&source=web&ots=ouLJg_A0fH&sig=NBlTGLqptZ6qpZJtpasn9njwHgc&hl=en#PPA295,M1

http://www.hindutva.org/landrajnamavali.html

Neutrality of the article

First this dosen't looks like an article as per wiki policy and next it don't have refrence sources with nuteral point so i will invite contributers to edit it or i propose the deletion of this article in case of no refrence avaliable--Sandeep (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: [1] (see [2]). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Content has again been placed in this article from that source and again been removed. Content such as this:

In June 1033, as per Hindu traditions, before the beginning of hostilities, the Hindu kings sent a messenger to Masud that this land being theirs, his troops should peacefully vacate it. But Masud sent a reply that all land belonged to Khuda (the Persianized version of Allah) and he could settle wherever he pleased. And that it was his holy duty to convert to Islam all those who did not recognize his Khuda and accept Islam.

Is by no means written in original language when the source says this:

As was their practice, before the beginning of hostilities, the Hindu kings also sent a messenger to Masud that this land being theirs, his troops should peacefully vacate it.... But Masud sent a reply that all land belonged to Khuda (the Persianized version of Allah) and he could settle wherever he pleased. And that it was his holy duty to convert to Islam all those who did not recognize his Khuda and accept Islam.

This content cannot be permitted to remain on Wikipedia. Material must be rewritten from scratch. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:36, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

The recent addition is a better paraphrase of the original source (with the exception of one sentence, removed), but it seems to have copied content wholesale from [3]: "It was a temple of Morning Sun, as the golden rays of the rising Sun first touched the feet of the deity. ...." This has been removed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Ghazi

The article says:

As he was killed in a battle, he came to be known as a Ghazi

This is logically a problem. A Ghazi is one who has participated in a (just) Holy War, while one who is martyred (in any cause) is a Shaheed. Not saying he wasn't killed; just that the title doesn't come from that.

— iFaqeer (talk to or email me) 21:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)