Talk:Ghassulian

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mix-up SITE and PERIOD/CULTURE persists

Teleilat Ghassul, a site in Jordan, is the type-site for a Chalcolithic culture and phase identified over a much larger territory, certainly in Israel and the Pal. territories, maybe elsewehere too (S Syria?). The article makes a melange of the two. Any page whose TOPIC is not clearly defined is a mess. Suggestions? ArmindenArminden (talk) 08:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources in introductory section

Hello all,

The introductory section is based on the entry "Ghassulian culture" in Britannica online, someone just needs to add the proper references. This article is very rudimentary and, in parts, not very accurate, so I've decided to take it as a personal project to improve it. Khayyam 77 (talk) 14:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again,

A quick question for all you copper-age fans: although I'm conducting extensive searches on the web for reliable sources to use in this article, my main source, although superb (an authority on the subject and a highly respected professor of archaeology in the Tel-Aviv university), is rather outdated - 1980. Archaeology is an accumulative discipline, so..... should I be relying on it as my only source for some of the material I intend to add to this article, or shouldn't I? Thanks Khayyam 77 (talk) 09:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

There seem to be 2 conflicting dating systems for the Chalcolitic and Ghassulian cultures - one old, one newer, supported by C14 dating. Working on it.... Khayyam 77 (talk) 21:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ghassulian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070218000617/http://www.near-east.historians.co.uk/html/chalcolithic.html to http://www.near-east.historians.co.uk/html/chalcolithic.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]