Jump to content

Talk:Getty Foundation/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SarahStierch (talk) 22:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This is a nice, simply written article that provides a basic and stable encyclopedic review of the Getty Foundation. It's layout is easily readable as well.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No photos really available, logo, etc. Fine with no image.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    The only addition I could see to this is an organization infobox perhaps?