Talk:Get Up with It

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Jazz Mid‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Cope, Julian (June 2001). "Miles Davis on the One". Head Heritage. Retrieved June 5, 2023.

Album

Wikipedia erroneously calls this album a compilation. Here's a review from the time period that calls it a double album. https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-album-reviews/get-up-with-it-102991/ There are no sources that call it a compilation.

Big agreement on this. There is a very simple way the wording could be changed, but it would no doubt send people like the "reliable source" maven at the bottom of the page here into a tizzy. One of those instances where I'm more than happy to let the erroneous info stay, proudly tied in the page history to those who insist on it not being properly credited.

Capitalization

Is "up" not functioning as an adverb in the title? If so, it should be capitalized in the title. I do not know how to fix this. Funkeboy 11:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right. Allmusic has it as "Get Up with It". Sony/Legacy shows it as "Get Up With It". Amazon lists it both ways. If anyone disagrees, please do a proper page move or ask someone for help. This article was previously subject to a cut-and-paste move, with the result that there were two (nearly identical) forks from the same article. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Miles Davis get up with it.png

Image:Miles Davis get up with it.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I've added a fair use rationale. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

before five years of retirement from music

"it was Davis' last studio album before five years of retirement from music."

Is this really true? I just browsed the chronology and there were other released studio albums. Greets. --87.123.141.32 (talk) 10:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anything released had already been recorded prior to 1975 (e.g. Circle in the Round, I think). He recorded a little between 1975 and 1980 but none of it was officially released. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Get Up with It. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/milesdavis/albums/album/136757/review/5946739/get_up_with_it

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources verify that this album is a compilation

Jazziz magazine: ...On the Corner was Miles Davis’ last official studio album release of the ’70s... (implying Get Up with It is not a studio album ([1])
Signal to Noise magazine: ...a sprawling double LP compilation, Get Up with It ([2])
Global Grind: ...1974 compilation album Get Up with It. ([3])

isento (talk) 17:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]