Jump to content

Talk:Gertrude Rhinelander Waldo House/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 16:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 05:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Epicgenius, I'll take this review.  750h+ | Talk  05:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment table

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lead section

[edit]

Site

[edit]
  • These include 888 Madison Avenue, a 22,000-square-foot (2,000 m2) store completed in 2010 as Ralph Lauren's secondary flagship;[9] it is designed in a Beaux-Arts style with a limestone facade and marble interiors,[10][11] The Rhinelander Mansion shares the block with St. James' Episcopal Church immediately to the south, 36 East 72nd Street to the east, and 740 Park Avenue to the southeast. Should "The Rhinelander Mansion" have a capital "The"? This sentence might be a bit too long too.  750h+ | Talk  13:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture

[edit]

History

[edit]

Impact

[edit]

Nothing from me, this is fine.

Image review—pass

[edit]

The prose is excellent. So are the images. The images included are appropriately licensed, so this is an image pass.

Source review

[edit]

Reviewing this version

  • Source 1 OK, checked on each instance of usage, checked via Google Books
  • Source 2 OK, checked on each instance of usage, checked via Open Library
  • Source 3 OK, checked on each instance of usage
  • Source 10 OK, checked on each instance of usage
  • Source 20 OK, checked on each instance of usage
  • Source 27 OK, checked on each instance of usage
  • Source 30 OK, checked on each instance of usage
  • Source 48 OK, checked on each instance of usage, Newspapers.com source
  • Source 65 OK, checked on each instance of usage
  • Source 95 OK, checked on each instance of usage
  • Source 120 OK
  • Source 121 OK, checked on each instance of usage
  • Source 138 OK, checked on each instance of usage
  • Source 191 OK, both sources were checked.

Happy to pass the source review.

Verdict

[edit]

No comments left, happy to pass this article for GA status. Great job on it.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.