Talk:German destroyer Z3 Max Schultz/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MisterBee1966 (talk · contribs) 12:22, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I will base my review on Hildebrand, Röhr and Steinmetz volume 6 pages 55 to 57. MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:22, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Hildebrand, Hans H.; Röhr, Albert; Steinmetz, Hans-Otto (1993). Die Deutschen Kriegsschiffe. Vol. 1–10. Ratingen: Mundus Verlag. ASIN B003VHSRKE.
- First commander was KK Martin Baltzer, later Viceadmiral and chief of the Marine Personalamt (chief of the naval personnel office). Teddy Suhren would later have his discepancies with Baltzer
- Added.
- 308 sailors lost their lives
- Added.
- the new bow increased length from 119m to 119.3m
- Added.
- the 6 x 2cm guns were augmented by further 2 x 2cm guns, at the time of her sinking she had 8 x 2cm guns
- Gröner says the light AA armament wasn't increased to 8 x 20mm until mid-1942.
- Now tell me, why and how would the Germans add two guns to a sunken ship in the middle of the North Sea? MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- I rather expect that he's talking about the surviving ships in general.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Would that apply to the type 1934 and 1934A class destroyers? I mean not that many stayed around long enough to see 1942 MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- There were more of the 16 that survived to '42 than you might think, so it may be more relevant than you think.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Would that apply to the type 1934 and 1934A class destroyers? I mean not that many stayed around long enough to see 1942 MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- I rather expect that he's talking about the surviving ships in general.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Now tell me, why and how would the Germans add two guns to a sunken ship in the middle of the North Sea? MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Gröner says the light AA armament wasn't increased to 8 x 20mm until mid-1942.
- I recommend to use the full name of Kampfgeschwader 26, not the abbreviated KG 26 version
- Done.
- "Fleet review" links to "Fleet review (Commonwealth realms)"; Is this appropriate here?
- Lacking a generic Fleet Review article, what else can I do? I can delete the link entirely if you'd prefer. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Just food for thought! Just because I find this awkward does not mean that it is inappropriate. MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lacking a generic Fleet Review article, what else can I do? I can delete the link entirely if you'd prefer. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)