Talk:Gerboise Bleue (nuclear test)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gerboise Bleue (nuclear test) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Algeria Mid‑importance

	Algeria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / African / European / French / Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	African military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

bad math

how is 22 kt one-third of 70 kt?

20kt

i don't know why someone told the bomb was 20kt while it was actually 70kt. you jealous! :) i have corrected it though Cliché Online 01:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

french nuclear tests

more infos to translate are available at fr:Essais nucléaires français.

full report

[1] Cliché Online 01:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

translation chart

Synthesis of the aerial tests: this official chart has every infos needed. it only needs to be translated in english, i dunno if i'll get time to do it myself. Cliché Online 02:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

archive videos

national audiovisual institute including exclusive video at ground zero and never seen before rushes of anti-saharian nuclear tests/pro independence FLN protesters in new york!! as well as the infamous B2-Namous top secret base used to develop chimical warfare. i will make screenshots! :) Cliché Online 10:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

woohoohoo! found a crazy archive of an atomic attack simulation with aircrafts and everything! :)

here "EN CAS DE MALHEUR" Cliché Online 11:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor cleeanup

I fixed some grammar errors and style inconsistencies.

The original author was not a native anglophone (though with excellent English ability) causing some grammar and usage errors, and a sentence style sometimes not optimal English. (Run-on sentences, several of which I broke up.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rrostrom (talk • contribs) 23:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

tricolor

The article states (without reference) that the tests were named for the French tricolor. But later in the article it is disclosed that there were actually 4 tests, the fourth being "Green" , and having nothing to do with the tricolor. Perhaps it's true that that was the original ratioanle, but it'd be nice to see some supporting references. Isarig 02:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this statement from the article. I have not come across any reference to the tricolor in my research, and as the contributor cites no source, I'm assuming this was speculation. Oh358chang 11:42, 09 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]