Jump to content

Talk:Georgian Land Forces

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

T-84 Oplot

[edit]

here is reliable sources from eurodialogue.org kyivpost.com eurasianet.org geopoliticalmonitor.com

Alexander Vershbow clearly said that Ukraine holded this tanks to Georgia in 2012.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5].

Vershbow is not in any position to have information about any arms deal between Ukraine and Georgia and such an information was denied officialy anyway, years ago. Neither Georgia nor Ukraine confirms such an information. Those are outdated and unconfirmed ones beeing used over and over again by the same person. Now stop your efforts I'm tired of cleaning up all the time. Please !

References

Land or Ground?

[edit]

Is the proper name Land Forces or Ground Forces? Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.army-technology.com/projects/didgori-apc/
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.army-technology.com/projects/lazika-infantry-fighting-vehicle/
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Massive issues with vandalismTheMightyGeneral (talk) 08:07, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

[edit]

I am trying to keep the arms table as realistic as possible while some people made some redicilous edits regarding the numbers. I don't know what it is, trolling or over-patriotism. In either case it's becoming embarassing. I won't delete the new table design but there once again has to be fixed a lot of stuff. In the new one, again overblown numbers on vehicles. Persons who edited them and constantly try to change them are delusional. The only increase in vehicle numbers is that of domestic ones. Especialy the number on Soviet vehicles is decreasing because of maintanance issues. Instead those people fabricate an increase of 100%+. The number of specific aircraft in the aircraft inventory are redicilous. Not even the pictures match. Wrong pictures of different weapons on domestic products. ( PDM-1, RD-7, ZCRS-122(G-122), G-13(G5)-not even a service rifle. There is only a number of G-13 which were experimental mockups etc ). There is a lot wrong with this article. Also when it says N/A it means N/A. I'm tired of cleaning this mess already.

I think the users adding false information are just over-patriotic. This article was very neglected until last year when I expanded it significantly. Since then I just gave up on trying to keep the Georgian users under control with regards to the information they add. I don't think you'll find a way to get it into their heads that they are actually damaging the article by adding inflated numbers. Tomh903 (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am Georgian myself and the behaviour of some of my compatriots is damn embarassing. It just doesn't get into their thick heads no matter how many times I try to explain or fix this article. It was stable for some while now someone else came up or maybe the same person/s ( I don't even care anymore ) and made the most redicilous edits so far. I will fix it again when I have time and would also appreciate if you or anyone else could provide some detailed info, preferebly 2013-2014. I don't know if anyone is able to provide details from Janes. Probably one of the best sources. Thank you for your attention Tomh903 TheMightyGeneral (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS: that T-84 Oplot deal was hoax. It has been denied by Georgian media and officials already some years ago. Just sourcing a hoax claim is not a reason to keep the hoax alive .... It has been debunked.

Contradiction

[edit]

Either Georgia was left with virtually no military on the dissolution of the Soviet Union, or two of the four Soviet divisions were transitioned into Georgian formations (the 10th Guards Motor Rifle Division at Akhaltsikhe was replaced by the 22nd Motorised Brigade, and the 152nd Motor Rifle Division at Kutaisi was replaced by the 21st Motorised Brigade). It cannot be both, as the article currently implies.Royalcourtier (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Georgian Land Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Georgian Land Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]