Talk:Georgian LGBT propaganda law
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The title of the article
[edit]I'm wondering why is this merely a "propaganda law" while the Hungarian law is labeled a Hungarian anti-LGBT law? It's obvious that this Georgian law is much harsher and explicitly homophobic than those laws passed in Hungary, Lithuania, Kyrgyzstan and Bulgaria. Why are u trying to make this Georgian law look less harsh when actually its text is explicitly anti-LGBT worded? It should be named Georgian anti-LGBT law because it actually IS anti-LGBT law. Cyanmax (talk) 17:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 17 December 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Georgian LGBT propaganda law be renamed and moved to Georgian anti-LGBT law. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Georgian LGBT propaganda law → Georgian anti-LGBT law – For consistency and unbiased approach. This law is not only about "propaganda". It targets same-sex adoption, trans rights, pride flags and more. It's obvious that this Georgian law is much harsher and explicitly homophobic than those laws passed in Hungary, Lithuania, Kyrgyzstan and Bulgaria. It even designates 17 May (IDAHOBIT) as a holiday for the "sanctity of the family and respect for parents". If that's still not enough, I don't know what to say. I'm wondering why is this merely a "propaganda law" while the Hungarian law is labeled a Hungarian anti-LGBT law? Where is the Wikipedia's consistency? Cyanmax (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2024 (UTC)