Talk:Georgia Hopley/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 02:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Looking at this one. —Ed!^(talk) 02:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

1. It is reasonably well written:

   Dab links, dup links, external links tools all show no problems. Copyvio tool reads green.

   • See WP:LEAD for a guide on writing the lead section. It should be expanded somewhat to more fully summarize the entire article.
   • "Hopley was educated in Bucyrus and then abroad," -- where? There's an OSU campus there and some community colleges but unclear.
   • The Columbus School Journal -- How long was this publication active and what did it focus on?
   • "Hopley's duties drew some criticism." -- Explain a bit the nature of this criticism.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:

   Source Spotcheck Refs 2, 13 and 17 all back up material cited in the article.

3. It is broad in its coverage:

   Not Yet

   • Surprised you didn't use this source from the ATF: https://www.atf.gov/our-history/prohibition-agent-georgia-hopley it expands upon a few points:

   • The problem law enforcement had of women being used by bootleggers and how Hopley's appointment was part of a solution
   • Mentions her role in law enforcement appreciation day in Ohio
   • Talks about her work in women's suffrage after leaving the ATF.

   • This book too could be added, which goes a bit more into her motivations [1]
   • This book too contains one of her reports at BLS which you can use to add some details about what she uncovered when under this assignment. [2]

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   Pass No problems there.

5. It is stable:

   Pass No problems there.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:

   Pass Two images tagged PD where appropriate.

7. Other:

   On Hold Pending a few additions. —Ed!^(talk) 03:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ed!: Thanks for your review and comments, sorry I overlooked this until now. I'll make corrections and additions tomorrow (Thursday). Cheers. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Ed!, it looks lilke Animalparty did indeed do a bunch of edits on February 1 (the aforementioned "tomorrow"), so perhaps you might want to check to see whether they were sufficient to address your concerns. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the ping! Having searched around to see if there were any more detail around Ohio sources that could be added I'm not seeing a lot at the moment, so going to say this one has all the detail that can be easily found. Based on these improvements, going to Pass the GA now. Thanks for the work! —Ed!^(talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)