Talk:Georgetown, South Carolina

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

^{Superscript text}

Most northern natural palmetto hammock

I remember reading in a tour info book while vacationing in the Myrtle Beach that Georgetown, SC is actually the northern limit of natural sabal palmetto's and that the palmettos found north of Georgetown are all transplants or are naturalized from earlier transplants (this does not include sabal minor or needle palm which have a more northern limit and are not really the palmettos that people think of when talking about palm trees as they are generally trunkless or have relatively very small trunks). I thought this was a pretty cool tid-bit and would like to add it to the article but I have since lost any reference to this fact and am hopping that someone out there might be able to add mention of this with a reference to this article. Thanks!

Uni student

I am a university student. I would like to know materials of glossy paper. Thanks alot for your help. My email address: Aryairan1979v1979 at yahoo dot com

The African American population is the majority is should not be listed second.

The African American population is the majority is should not be listed second.Operationmajoritypower 06:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Town USA

Someone should include a writeup on the Nikon Picture Town promotion recently recorded in their commercials. MichaelProcton 17:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Population boom

The great increase in population 1950–1960 should be addressed in the article since it appears to be so anomalous. Is it largely due to a major annexation, a large increase in the industrial base, both of these or other factors? My experience tells me that it is largely the former, but I would love verification of this. 2600:1004:B14F:C56D:A0B4:CBA1:59EE:FC01 (talk) 22:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Georgetown, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Georgetown, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://factfinder2.census.gov/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116234803/http://www.kchistory.org/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=%2FLocal&CISOPTR=22900&CISOBOX=1&REC=14 to http://www.kchistory.org/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=%2FLocal&CISOPTR=22900&CISOBOX=1&REC=14

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]