Talk:George Spencer-Churchill, Marquess of Blandford

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 July 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Notability

Unfortunately, I've no time to research and add it at present, but reasons for the Marquess' notability are

When he was very young, ?two years old, his grandfather disinherited his father, and made him heir apparent to Blenheim Palace, although the title of Duke of Marlborough would still pass via his father. (This arrangement was said to be due to his father's severe drug addiction at the time, and his grandfather's fear that he would raise funds for his addiction by selling or mortgaging assets.)
He was also put in charge of (I forget the name of his position, and I'm not sure when he was appointed) the management trust for Blenheim Palace.
Those arrangements have not been publicly changed (or at the least, no change has been well publicised). If they are unchanged, then since his grandfather's recent death, he is the owner and manager of the only non-royal palace in Britain.
Even if the arrangements have changed, he is still heir apparent to an estate valued at £100 million, stretching to 11,000 acres (17 square miles), including a 187 room palace grander than many of the royal palaces, plus over 200 other dwellings, with a workforce of over 150 and income of £12 million/year from visitors alone, before adding the farming and other income. He seems more worthy of inclusion than a number of minor royals who we include.

Enginear (talk) 04:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this article should be retained. I have done some research and sought to show his notability by adding numerous citations from reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide relevant information. It indicates at WP:BIO that: "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". -- Blairall (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about if someone had served time with him in the channel islands,when he was caught by customs with drugs in his possession while on his way to his helicopter,and then was senticed to jail,and was looked after by a scouser,who protected him while he,was there,and the when released gave the scouser,a job and looked after him,made sure he was protected while,he got his drugs from Liverpool, and also his male companionship in secret seems how he like young boys,theres alot of stuff been hidden from searches on Internet because he was so well protected,but people who know will remember the amount of scousers he had on payroll and used to party in his estate,and loved using his hunting shotguns there,im only putting this up now in my own identity because i havent long left to be here,and spent last 2 years,getting some vhs recordings put too digital and left with people from what people recorded,and also because its will leave my children and grandkids with some money from my story,with the deal ive done and the back up ive got,legally !! 2A02:C7C:2EA1:5E00:3868:FB7A:CEEA:B404 (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]