A fact from George Russell Davis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that in Wilson v. Territory of Arizona, 7 Arizona 47 (1901), Judge George Russell Davis found that bad spelling in a court finding was insufficient to overturn a conviction?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
The sources available to me do not make it possible to either confirm or refute the possibility. As per the Arizona Republican story cited by this article, Davis was one of three judges to lose his position on the Superior Court of Los Angeles during the 1910 election. A report in the Los Angeles Herald showing election results does not organize the candidates by seat but instead lumps them all together. Best guess, the three seats on the bench went to the candidates with the highest number of votes without individuals contesting for specific seats. --Allen3talk12:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rereading that Arizona Republican piece, it seems to impy that all three successful candidates were backed by the Goo-Goos. If that's correct, then they got a very bad bargain indeed in the case of the later infamous Gavin Craig! Ceannlann gorm (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
