Talk:George Norcross

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV????

Norcross isn't exactly the most popular political figure in New Jersey, but that still doesn't mean WP needs to run a hit piece on him. There are more weasel words in this article than I can count. Is Norcross mob-affiliated? Is he an instrument of corruption? If he is, cite yourself. If you can't, take that stuff out. But don't attack the man with innuendo. --Francisx 16:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I don't even know anything about this guy but this has some major point of view problems.Bronayur 00:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs work

Norcross is a very important figure, and his entry should be far longer than this. It should be possible to write a much more extensive bio while preserving NPOV. I know there are Jersey political wonks out there who'd love to contribute... Mrwriter 21:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read what Philadelphia Magazine has to say about George Norcross

www.phillymag.com/articles/they_have_no_choice/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by N. Regina (talk • contribs) 22:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

In case the criticism section gets removed by the subject of the article or someone closed connected to him, I am adding the idea of a criticism section to the Talk page. ("Chris Hedges has expressed that Norcross exerts out-sized and corrupt influence over Camden's politics and economy, using intimidation to keep local officials under control. The office of the Attorney General of New Jersey, in a string operation, recorded Norcross but he was never charged.") — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greeneditor491 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Norcross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040807050751/http://politicsnj.com/murphy070102_statesenate.htm to http://www.politicsnj.com/murphy070102_statesenate.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Norcross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]