Talk:George Macaulay

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George Macaulay article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Fast bowling#Categorisation of fast bowling|medium-fast]] The anchor (#Categorisation of fast bowling) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

George Macaulay is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 7, 2015.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 6, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
August 26, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
October 20, 2010	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Cricket: Europe cricket Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Europe cricket task force. New participants are always welcome!

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal George Macaulay is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:George Macaulay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrias ^talk 09:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

As he was an English cricketer, I'd prefer to see the English date format 7 December 1897 – 13 December 1940 used. Especially as this is how you seem to format dates in the rest of the article.
In you second paragraph you've got Tests matches, no need for the 's' on Test.
Link to the cricket team at the first usage of England (after Test matches).
Do you really need to say Wisden Cricketers' Almanack's Cricketers of the Year, or would Wisden Cricketers of the Year suffice?
"professional cricker" – simple typo.

All done. The dates came from a previous version of the article. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Early life

What does George Freeman have to do with anything? Should I have heard of him?

Famous Yorkshire bowler from 1870s, but no need to mention him really. Took him out. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the lead you use World War II, here you use First World War, could you be consistent in your terminology. Also, neither need linking.

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Macaulay had been spotted by Sir Stanley Christopherson. – You should expand upon the relevance of this. Was he representing another county?

Very few details of where and how, and not sure what role the two people who spotted him played. Can only have been while playing club cricket, but not too sure where this would have been. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Surrey links to 'Surrey CCC' rather than 'Surrey County Cricket Club'
In ten first-class matches that season, he took 24 wickets at an average of 24.35, – link 'average' to bowling average, and maybe do so in the lead too.
and managed a top score of just 15 with the bat[13] but – I'm assuming you meant to put a comma after bat; there should be one anyway!
His innings of 125 not out took – link 'not out'.
four consecutive seasons where Yorkshire – 'in which' would sound better than 'where'.
out of a total of a total of 430 – not so many totals! Remove one set of 'a total of's.
although there were concern that – 'concerns', not 'concern'.

All done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

You've abbreviated RAF, I'd put it back to Royal Air Force, and regardless of which you use, link to Royal Air Force, not the RAF redirect.

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Test debut

took a wicket with his first ball, only the fourth player to do so; only nine more have done so since, as of March 2010. – the whole sentence is slightly clunky, and you have redundancy with the terms 'more' and 'since'. I'd rephrase to something along the lines of took a wicket with his first ball, becoming only the fourth player to do so, while only nine others have done so since, as of March 2010.

Done as suggested.--Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Three of the four sentences after this one start with the phrase 'He went on' (or once 'He then went on'). I'm not keen on the phrase anyway, but three times that quickly is something we could definitely do without!

Done --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does Wisden say he was in excellent form for 1923, or do you?

Wisden! Now referenced. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

on all kinds if pitches – 'of' not 'if'

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Despite this, he took the best total of wickets he had managed yet, – Doesn't work for me at all. The whole sentence could probably do with rephrasing.

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He took seven wickets for 13 against Glamorgan, bowling the side out for 63. This sentence just seems stuck in there; was it his best return of the season? If so, comment on that, otherwise give it some context at least!

Best return of season, but not actually sure it should be there at all. Leaving it for now. Explained it was his best return. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your paragraph about his 1924 season starts with a series of disjointed sentences, seemingly statement after statement. Could you try and make it flow a little better, it would improve the readability!

I think I've improved it. Let me know if it's still clunky. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

R.C. Robertson-Glasgow said (writing in 1943) that Macaulay – would probably read better as Writing in 1943, R.C. Robertson-Glasgow said that Macaulay...

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-1920s career

1925 was Macaulay's most successful season in terms of wickets. – per WP:MOSNUM you shouldn't start a sentence with a number, I'd suggest rephrasing, as writing a year out in full is equally as frowned upon!

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

However, he was selected for.. – Don't start a paragraph with 'however', it's okay, if not great, midway through a paragraph, but not to start one. You've also used it a lot, so maybe looking at working a few of them out of the article.

Got rid of several of them. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline

a Test trial in 1928 where he failed to take a wicket. – use 'in which' rather than 'where'.

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Return to form

in an end of season game at Scarborough for the M.C.C. Australian Touring Team – I know what the MCC Australian Touring Team is, but to someone who doesn't follow cricket closely, it might sound like he was played for an Australian team, rather than the MCC team that toured Australia. Would be nice to clarify.

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final seasons

Macaulay's final two seasons were affected by injury. In the 1934 season, Macaulay, while trying to take a catch – No need to repeat his name in the second instance.
The next season, 1935 was his final one. – Commas both sides of 1935 here please.
and Yorkshire made him a special grant of £250. – Odd phrasing, maybe "awarded him a special.."

All done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Style and personality

Bill Bowes described how when he was bowling, he would.. – Comma between how and when.

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Dablinks shows three ambiguous links; Arthur Carr, Arthur Richardson and Herne Bay.

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll continue through the rest of the article later for you. Harrias ^talk 09:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for review so far. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now done up to the end of the Decline section. Harrias ^talk 11:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And that's the article. Nice work; similar to the comments Aaroncrick made during his review, I think you possibly churned this article out a little too fast and didn't look hard enough at the language, but nevertheless it's a good piece of work. If you were looking to take it on for FA in the future, you'd need a more serious copy-edit, but I'm happy that it meets the standards for GA once you've made the remaining fixes. Regards, Harrias ^talk 08:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Probably agree. When I'm working mainly from stats and not articles, I do tend to rush the writing a bit. Certainly needs improving if it ever went to FA, but not sure the content warrants FA at the moment and there aren't any other sources I know of. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]