Talk:George Leake

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George Leake article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Western Australia / Politics

	Australia portal George Leake is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Posthumous CMG

We say the King "had intended to make him a CMG". The wording "had intended" suggests that Leake's death intervened and the award was never made. But we show him as a "posthumous CMG", which suggests the award was made. The "It's an Honour" reference says the award was made on 26 June 1902, two days after his death. So, it was indeed made and it was indeed posthumous. We need to follow "... had intended to make him a CMG" with "and made this award posthumously", otherwise it gives quite a misleading impression to a casual reader. -- JackofOz (talk) 21:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Year or birth – 1847 or 1856?

It can't be both. Chris the speller ^yack 16:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]