Talk:George Eaton (journalist)

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 November 2019. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George Eaton (journalist) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Media

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Scruton controversy

--2A02:8084:609E:4800:9DEA:1D0F:5F11:3086 (talk) 10:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC) I removed the newly added section on the Scruton controversy, instead adding the content to the career section. The subject's Wikipedia page is not substantial enough, nor is the controversy significant enough, to justify a stand-alone section. The content of the section required much condensing and improvement in the language. All related references required fixing.[reply]

I never added this section, but having read it found it both inaccurate and misleading, not to say defamatory of Sir Roger Scruton. That is, in fact, the whole source of the controversy. I was attempting to correct it when somebody came along and interfered in media res. They have now made a mess of what I attempted to correct. This is sheer vandalism on their part. Vancouveriensis (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should there not be a separate section? The section that there is now doesn't emphasise enough that Eaton was shown to be a liar, and almost certainly did it for political reasons. Rustygecko (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality

I found it interesting that Eaton declared Scruton not only as a rightwinger and racist, but in particular a "homophobe". This is not an aspect of Sir Roger one would normally emphasize if one does not feel personally affected. So I think the question is justified if Eaton felt he had to avenge himself and his "kin". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rheinvolk (talk • contribs) 07:21, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that is a question for Wikipedia actually. You're just speculating, which is not what Wikipedia is for. I've noticed you've got a bit of a tendency to add speculative comments like this to Talk pages in Wikipedia. You might like to consider the policy Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Seaweed (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]