Jump to content

Talk:George Dalgarno

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Javirl 11:16, 18 July 2005 (UTC) This article lacks reference to Dalgarno's artificial language, which is truly interesting. I'll add it when I have the time.[reply]

what kind of language?

[edit]
Dalgarno was also interested in constructing what he called a 'philosophical language', now more usually referred to as universal language.

These are different concepts; to choose between them, I'd need to know a bit more about his purposes. —Tamfang (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They are different concepts now, but at the time (1600s) universality is pretty much what all the philosophical languages were going for. (Or looking for the original 'Adamic language', but I think they'd consider that roughly equivalent to 'universal'.) See e.g. Leibniz's similar work at around the same period. I don't know Dalgarno's, but it's a reasonable guess that it was doing the same. --Sai ¿? 00:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Dalgarno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]