Talk:Geoffrey of Villehardouin

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages: Crusades Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

Untitled

I took out the part where someone alleged that G. didn't explain why the crusade was diverted. G. explains clearly that the crusaders had to attack Zara because they were short of the funds they had promised the Doge of Venice in return for his ships and men. They attacked Constantinople because the deposed prince Alexius promised them an enormous sum of money, which never materialized.

Ocanter 22:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. G. supplies reasons in both cases; he deals with the negotiations with Alexios at considerable length. Andrew Dalby 09:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~I think I might have translated this from the fr: article originally; there is a similar sentence there. (Well that's my excuse anyway!)~~ Er, nevermind, the French article didn't exist then...Adam Bishop 14:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it looks as thought the French article was expanded (in mid 2005) on the basis of the English one, which is why it also makes this statement! Andrew Dalby 15:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]