Jump to content

Talk:Geoffrey Robertson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

Saying Whitehouse acted 'maliciously' is blatantly POV - a malicious prosecution is one where the person initiating the prosecution has acted both dishonestly and unreasonably, and that the desire to ensure the law is enforced is not a motivating factor. Now while its debatable whether she was being reasonable or not (and a neutral encyclopedia should not be taking sides on that matter) I think its hard to remain neutral and yet claim Whitehouse was acting dishonestly. She was rather upfront that she believed the actions of, amongst others, Gay News (for example) were in violation of the law. To use the inherently loaded term 'malicious prosecution' without at least some finding by a court that they were malicious prosecutions we're siding with one side against another. Wikipedia should report the facts (that she brought prosecutions) not provide an opinion on whether those actions were justified or not. -- Chrism 18:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

that makes sense but it also questions your edit. "Moral decency campaigner" connotes a person who is campaigning for moral decency. Who are you, or I, or anyone, to judge whether she was advocating "decency"? Many would feel that her actions were extremely immoral.
perhaps "private prosecution by the morality campaigner Mary Whitehouse" is better. What do you think? --Sumple (Talk) 05:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That was something I was unsure about when I was editing it. I also thought it sounded pretty clumsy but couldn't think of a more elegant way of putting it. Morality campaigner seems fine.--Chrism 09:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sources

[edit]

I'm generally against including subject's opinions on other subjects, but this piece regarding the US invasion of Afghanistan may deserve a mention. SmartSE (talk) 15:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Geoffrey Robertson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geoffrey Robertson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Separated

[edit]

I think we should get a source more reliable/reputable than the Daily Mail (see WP:DAILY MAIL) for Robertson's and Lette's separation. Note that the current source, from news.com.au, quotes the DM, as do all other sources that I've seen. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geoffrey Robertson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]