Jump to content

Talk:Gento (song)/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

(
)

Apologies for the inconsistencies. I found another source that could replace the one I used prior that I think could work better and hopefully lessen the risk of the hook being contested. I wish the previous hooks to be scraped and opt for the one below.

Moved to mainspace by Abacusada (talk). Self-nominated at 08:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gento (song); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Abacusada: Good article. The other hooks could work as a possible alternate though. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your review, Onegreatjoke! I thought "likely the first" from the first source might draw troubles for this nomination, so I offered another alternative. Glad to know that it would work anyway. – Abacusada (t • c) 12:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


GA Review

Passed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gento (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 15:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I will handle this as my first review for the GAN backlog! --K. Peake 15:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

  • Came to fix the infobox only for this review. I'm leaving all the other stuff for the nominator to do. I changed all the hlists, except the language parameter, as it shows dot points. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 06:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Should EDM really be listed under genres in the infobox when it is only the breaks? ☒N Removed by Vaughan J.
  • Pipe John Paulo Nase to Pablo (musician)  Done
  • Mention in the first sentence that it was recorded for their second extended play, Pagtatag!  Partly done
    Opted for "..., taken from their second extended play (EP), Pagtatag! (2023)." instead.
  • Swap the release and writing/production sentences around  Done
  • "as the lead single from..." → "as the lead single from the album"  Done
    I replaced "album" to "EP" instead.
  • The trials part does not appear to be sourced  Done
    Removed
  • "lyricism and SB19's vocals and versatility." → "lyricism, SB19's vocals, and the versatility."  Done
  • "peaking at number" → "peaking at numbers"  Done

Background and release

  • Should the tour be introduced as their second concert tour or first worldwide tour per the source?  Done
    I introduced it as the first world tour instead.
  • "revealed that the boy band" → "revealed that SB19"  Done
  • "It marks the boy band's" → "It marked the boy band's"  Done
  • Remove commas around Pagisbol  Done
  • "The boy band announced that the EP" → "SB19 announced that Pagtatag!"  Done
  • "although they didn't reveal" → "although they did not reveal"  Done
  • "and was made available for" → "and it was made available for"  Done

Composition and lyrics

  • "which featured strong" → "which features strong"  Done
  • "by himself while he" → "by himself, while he"  Done
  • "Servida had worked with" → "Servida had previously worked with" and remove the first ep introduction  Done
  • "others describe the song as" → "others described the song as"  Done
  • "The song featured clapping sounds" → "The song features clapping sounds"  Done
  • "It included a message about" → "It includes a message about"  Done
  • "which was utilized along with" → "which is utilized along with"  Done

Reception

  • "is described as" → "was described as"  Done
  • "it did not affect the song's message," → "it did not affect the message,"  Done
  • "the song highlights the boy band's" → "the song highlights SB19's"  Done
  • Pipe music charts to Billboard charts  Done

Promotion

  • Img looks good!
  • Mention the quarry is large per the source  Done
  • "after its release." → "after being released."  Done
  • "John Legaspi of" → "John Legaspi of the" but where is "bop" sourced?  Done
    His comment was mentioned in the second paragraph: "Now with over four million views, the song clip, which is a total bop ..." Although I may have possibly taken it out of context.
  • Add a comma after Wish 107.5 Bus  Done
  • "The boy band embarked on" → "They embarked on"  Done

Controversy

  • "the music industry? It's" → "the music industry? [...] It's" per the source  Done
  • "the boy band was criticized online" → "SB19 was criticized online"  Done

Credits and personnel

Charts

  • Good

References

Final comments and verdict

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gento_(song)/Archive_1&oldid=1211558517"