Talk:Gensler
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article critique
[edit]Is there a template that says this is one of the worst articles on WP? GenslerOnCities was probably correct in not editing due to COI, but the below article is much better than what is there, and perhaps some material from the existing article could be merged into it. Perhaps I'll do it when I'm back from vacation. OOPS as of September 10: I should have looked at the history before I wrote this; one undo would have fixed the article. Very un-WP. Perhaps I'll look into merging some from the below later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.19.247.131 (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
69.19.247.51 (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
((RequestEdit))
[edit]My name is Leah and I work for Gensler. I recognize that since I work for Gensler I have a clear conflict of interest and will utilize the talk pages to discuss comments regarding the article.
I have created a new proposed article about Gensler that is updated and meets quality and sourcing standards compared to the current article. There are too many edits for this page to ask an editor to painstakingly change them one by one. As such, I am suggesting an entirely new article.
Additionally, I’m deleting the last set of recommended changes to the talk page that was made by a Gensler account back in 2010 (GenslerOnCities). These are outdated and did not follow Wikipedia’s rules. Leaving them up in the talk page may be confusing based on this new round of suggested edits.
My intent is not to transform this article into a glowing review of Gensler. Rather, I would like to make sure it is up to date and reflects general consensus.
Hi, it’s Leah again from Gensler. Since I haven’t heard any feedback on this (either supportive or constructive) I just wanted to come back to the talk pages to state that I plan on making the edits directly to the page that I suggested. I’ll wait another week or two for feedback or thoughts, but will then go in and post the updated edits maintaining transparency and acknowledgment that I have a clear conflict of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeahR11 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think you will have better luck suggesting single sentences or paragrpahs you think should be removed from or changed in the current version and suggesting additional sentences/paragraphs you think should be included (with third-party RSs) rather than proposing entire article replacements here. Novaseminary (talk) 22:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Blog link
[edit]An IP has repeatedly inserted a link to the Gensler blog in the external links section. WP:ELOFFICIAL indicates that secondary official website should be listed "only when the additional links provide the reader with unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites. For example, if the main page of the official website for an author contains a link to the author's blog and Twitter feed, then it is not appropriate to provide links to all three." I think this blog linked, prominently linked from the main Genlser website (along with other Genselr social media links), fits within this ELOFFICIAL prohibition. I will remove it, again. Novaseminary (talk) 04:06, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
EditRequest
[edit]My name is Leah and I work for Gensler. I noticed there were a few errors on this page. I realize I have a clear conflict of interest so I wanted to flag for the community first before I make any transparent edits.
The article should read that in 2012, Gensler generated the most revenue of any architecture firm based in the US for the second year in a row (Top 300 Architecture Firms, Architectural Record, July 2013) [1]and that as of 2013, it operates offices in 43 cities in 14 countries worldwide. These are minor edits, but worth noting since they are currently incorrect (Gensler’s Secret Sauce, Metropolis Magazine, June 2013) [2].
Additionally, under the staff section the article should read that as of 2013, Gensler employs more than 3,500 people (Gensler’s Secret Sauce, Metropolis Magazine, June 2013) [3].
Finally, I made some simple edits to the “Notable Gensler Buildings” section with a few more entries and also inserted some updated photos – all cited – to make things more up to date. These are fairly straightforward so did them myself, but please review since I have a conflict of interest here.
LeahR11 (talk) 12:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
References
Improved infobox
[edit]Put a proper company info-box template and added the details. A lot of public info can be added to the article regarding the founding and the projects (images are also available). Renzut
Chris Johnson (architect) listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chris Johnson (architect). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:58, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Key People title change
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- What I think should be changed:
Key people Andy Cohen, co-CEO Diane Hoskins, co-CEO
- Why it should be changed:
Andy Cohen's and Diane Hoskins' titles should be changed from "Co-CEO" to "Global Co-Chair”
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
https://www.archpaper.com/2023/10/gensler-julia-simet-jordan-goldstein-co-ceo-andy-cohen-diane-hoskins-global-co-chairs/ [1]
- Already done by another user The AP (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Add new text + citation naming new Global Co-Chairs and Co-CEOs
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- What I think should be changed:
Please add a new sentence at the end of this paragraph: “In 2005, Gensler's board of directors extended the firm's collaborative leadership structure by naming Andy Cohen, Diane Hoskins, and David Gensler as executive directors/Co-CEOs. Cohen and Hoskins continue their tenure as Co-CEOs.[6] In 2015, the firm celebrated its 50th anniversary.”
Please add this new/additional sentence to the end of the above paragraph: "After nearly 20 years of leadership, Cohen and Hoskins transitioned from their roles as co-CEOs to become Gensler’s first Global co-Chairs in 2024; the firm named Julia Simet and Jordan Goldstein as the incoming co-CEOs[2]."
- Why it should be changed:
Andy Cohen's and Diane Hoskins' titles should be changed from "co-CEO" to "Global co-Chair” and add the new co-CEOs, Julia Simet and Jordan Goldstein.
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
Designdork (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Klein, Kristine (October 4, 2023). "Gensler promotes Julia Simet and Jordan Goldstein to co-CEOs, Andy Cohen and Diane Hoskins as global co-chairs". The Architect's Newspaper.
- ^ "Gensler promotes Julia Simet and Jordan Goldstein to co-CEOs, Andy Cohen and Diane Hoskins as global co-chairs". Architect's Newspaper. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
- Already done by another user The AP (talk) 15:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Update Programs & Initiatives section.
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- What I think should be changed:
Add "and 2022[1]." to this line:
Gensler's “Impact Through Design” report, launched in 2016, explores strategies for architecture and design to play a greater role in global climate change strategy and mitigation,[32] reinforcing this commitment to sustainability with the firm's subsequent “Impact by Design” reports in 2017,[32] 2018,[33] 2019, 2020,[34] 2021.
And also add the following sentences at the end of the same section:
In 2023, Gensler announced the launch of the Gensler Product Sustainability (GPS) Standards v1.0. Starting in January 2024, the standards will be required for all Gensler projects in the U.S., Canada, and Europe[2]. At COP28, Gensler partnered with the International Finance Corporation (IFC) to jointly expand low-carbon building certification and access to green finance[3].
- Why it should be changed:
The 2022 Impact by Design report is available. Added Gensler Product Sustainability standard initiative, as well as IFC green finance partnership.
- References supporting the changes:
https://www.graphis.com/entry/8f27a188-01f9-4713-a83d-4ee78acbec8d/
https://sustainablebiz.ca/gensler-creates-product-sustainability-standards-for-building-industry
https://pressroom.ifc.org/all/pages/PressDetail.aspx?ID=27908
AMD90038 (talk) 19:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Climate Action Through Design 2022". GRAPHIS.com.
- ^ "Gensler creates Product Sustainability Standards for building industry". Sustainable Biz Canada. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
- ^ "IFC's EDGE Buildings and Gensler Join Forces at COP28 to Support Buildings Decarbonization, Sustainable Finance". International Finance Corporation.
Update Recognition section
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- What I think should be changed:
Edit this line: "Engineering News-Record ranked Gensler as the #1 Top Green Design Firm for six consecutive years, from 2016-2021.[48] The firm was second in the latest ranking in September of 2022.[49]" to read: "Engineering News-Record ranked Gensler as the #1 Top Green Design Firm in 2023[1]."
Partly done - It's important to keep the previous rankings as they're part of the company's history. I've added the 2023 ranking but not removed the previous ones.
Also Add the following items to the Recognition section:
For the 42nd consecutive year, Gensler received the highest ranking on Interior Design magazine's “Top 100 Giants” list in 2023[2].
Done
Gensler maintained the top position on Architectural Record’s Top 300 Architecture Firms[3] for the 12th consecutive year.
Done
The AIA honored Gensler’s repositioning of Willis Tower with the 2023 AIA National Interior Architecture Award[4] and awarded adaptive reuse project 633 Folsom the 2023 AIA National Architecture Award[5].
Done
The Center for Active Design awarded Gensler with as the company with the “Most Ambassadors” (All Time), as the company with the most Fitwel Accredited staff, in the 2023 Best in Building Health Awards[6].
Done
For the ninth consecutive year, Gensler received the #1 rank overall in Building Design's 2024 World Architecture 100 rankings[7].
Done
- Why it should be changed:
Adding the most up-to-date recognition from around the industry.
- References supporting the possible change (cited in edits above):
Interior Design Unveils the 2023 Top 100 Giants
ENR 2023 Top 100 Green Design Firms and Contractors: A Green Market Growth Spurt
Top 300 U.S. Architecture Firms of 2023
Project highlights: Willis Tower Repositioning
Project highlights: 633 Folsom
Fitwel’s 2023 Best in Building Health Awards Announced
WA100 2024: Back to reality for the world of architecture
AMD90038 (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "ENR 2023 Top 100 Green Design Firms and Contractors: A Green Market Growth Spurt". Engineering News-Record.
- ^ "Interior Design Unveils the 2023 Top 100 Giants". Interior Design Magazine. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
- ^ "Top 300 U.S. Architecture Firms of 2023". Architectural Record. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
- ^ "Project highlights: Willis Tower Repositioning". AIA.org. American Institute of Architects.
- ^ "Project highlights: 633 Folsom". AIA.org. American Institute of Architects.
- ^ "Fitwel's 2023 Best in Building Health Awards Announced". Fitwel.org.
- ^ "WA100 2024: Back to reality for the world of architecture". Building Design. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
- Partly done see above comments Encoded Talk 💬 06:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- Unknown-importance Anthropology articles
- C-Class Oral tradition articles
- Unknown-importance Oral tradition articles
- Oral tradition taskforce articles
- Implemented requested edits