Talk:Genital tubercle
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article Assessment for WikiProject Anatomy
[edit]Hello. I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
- Assess articles with class and importance factors
- WP:MED does not cover anatomy, removed tag
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 21:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- @Renaissancee, When dealing with genital anatomy I think you might look for a better phrase than "I hope to see it grow large!". Just sayin'! :D 172.88.146.9 (talk) 20:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Genital tubercle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060429053315/http://sprojects.mmi.mcgill.ca/embryology/ug/Reproductives/Normal/Male_external.html to http://sprojects.mmi.mcgill.ca/embryology/ug/Reproductives/Normal/Male_external.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)