Talk:Genevieve Atkinson/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: BrickHouse337 (talk · contribs) 21:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Fairly well written.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• Looks good; all of the sources are reliable and verifiable; great job.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Fairly well covered as far as focus.

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

4. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall, the article is in good article condition. Great work on this article everybody. Pass. --Brick House 337 21:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

As always, thank you very much for your fast and prompt review. It means a lot! Regards, Creativity97 21:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Wow this happened so quickly, all while I was sleeping! Thankyou so much for your speedy review :) means a lot to us! Arre 03:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)