Talk:Gene therapy for epilepsy

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Medical genetics task force.

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Untitled

This article's content was copied on Nov 11, 2013 from my page Therapy and its Application in Epilepsy and my original sandbox page stem cell and gene therapies for treating epilepsy to correct for the title changes. Since the transfer of information there have only been minor edits on the this wiki page.

Peer Reviews

1. Quality of Information: 2

The information included in this article is factual and covers current research regarding the topic.

2. Article size: 2

The article meets the size requirements.

3. Readability: 2

This article is easy to read.

4. Refs: 2

The author used more than the required number of references.

5. Links: 2

There are many links to other wikipedia pages throughout the article.

6. Responsive to comments: 2

The author was very responsive to edits and comments made by other users.

7. Formatting: 2

The article is well organized.

8. Writing: 2

This is well written and easy to understand.

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

The author's username includes his real name.

10. Outstanding?: 1

This article is interesting, but could use visual aids or more creativity.

_______________

Total: 19 out of 20

Catherine Kwon (talk) 05:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and I'll be sure to try incorporating some images. AlexLee90 (talk)

1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 2

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 2

5. Links: 2

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 2

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 2

_______________

Total: 20 out of 20

Great article: Very recent sources, good organization. I recommend to read through it one more time for very small grammar/punctuation/capitalization issues. Also, think about adding a picture or two.

Rachel Candace Law (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review! AlexLee90 (talk)

1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 2

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 2

5. Links: 2

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 2

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 2

_______________

Total: 20 out of 20

Great article. Very easy to follow. But what is CARNEY under the major challenges?

Thuy Le (talk) 23:27, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I have gone back and remove the typos. AlexLee90 (talk)