Talk:Geisel Library

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This page is within the scope of the UC San Diego task force. New members are always welcome!

San Diego Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject San Diego To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner.
Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego
Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles.
Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article.
Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California, geography stubs.
Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get San Diego into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Joke on old name

The library is more-or-less centered on the property. However, for many years it was in the northeast corner of the built area of the campus, hence the joke name "Not-so-Central."

The 3rd floor

A lot of this material is trivial, unencyclopedic, and unreferenced. The snopes.com ref does not directly or specifically reference UCSD. Zedla 00:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are two references.

One is the official Geisel Library site, which discusses exactly what is covered in this section ("missing" third floor, rumor that it's because of book weight).

The snopes reference was not included because it references UCSD -- it's there because it doesn't reference UCSD (other than to say this is "a widespread belief at any number of colleges"). It shows that the book weight urban legend is well-known, documents occurrences of it in the wild and demonstrates that it is neither based in fact nor original to the Geisel library.

I consider this section worthy of inclusion because it documents an unusual feature of the library and folk legend that has grown around it (again, as documented on the library's own Web site).--NapoliRoma 14:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HDR photograph of the library

Here is a nice-looking tone-mapped photo of the library:

Consider adding into the article? --anonymous 62.149.15.226 (talk) 16:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I put it in. Binksternet (talk) 23:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read/Write/Think/Dream image

Why not flip the image so that the text goes the right way? Or is there some sort of Wikipedia convention against this for some reason? I'd do it myself but I don't think one can do so without a registered account, probably, though I've never actually tried... 69.62.229.176 (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flipping the image would suggest that the READ/WRITE/THINK/DREAM artwork faces inward, which is not accurate. I have updated the caption to solve both issues. I will try to take a photo as it appears from outside the library. --TritonsRising (talk) 00:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

on-going contest at library-- was it ever featured in Star Trek?

http://libraries.ucsd.edu/about/see-also/geisel-library-urban-legends.html#film

How can popular culture not include this? --Michelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.74.143 (talk) 03:59, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geisel Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Mandeville Special Collections and Archives

We normally do not make articles for collections within a library, unless particularly famous, and that needs to be shown by third party sources--and there are no third party sources here DGG ( talk ) 06:52, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, collection does not demonstrate notability but the information within (with appropriate 3rd party sources) should be incorporated into Geisel Library TritonsRising (talk) 23:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]