Talk:Boykin, Alabama
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
A fact from Boykin, Alabama appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 December 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Lawsuit
[edit]I added the information about the lawsuit filed by two of the Gee's Bend quilters against the Arnett's. I would like someone to offer input and information on how to better word or construct that section. Jasgrider 15:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Reformating/Updating
[edit]I began to reformat this page into a more structured entry. Please look at it and edit it or offer suggestions on how we can make it better. Jasgrider 15:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Boykin, Alabama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928043500/http://geesbendferry.com/index.html to http://geesbendferry.com/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912042819/http://www.flypmedia.com:80/issues/09/ to http://www.flypmedia.com/issues/09/#15/1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Arthur Rothstein
[edit]The article is written as if the reader knows who Arthur Rothstein is; Rothstein pops up in the first paragraph with no context. The third paragraph refers again to his visit. Later, a documentary trip is described as getting the 'after' pictures, even though the 'before' element of that metaphor hasn't been established. I think the article should be edited slightly to handle the Rothstein angle better, making the resulting article more linear, and less of an insider's account.
Suggestion: (1) delete the sentence about Rothstein in the first paragraph, which is creating problems and also not adding very much value to the long-view history of the place. (2) Add a sentence to the end of the second paragraph that properly introduces the topic of Rothstein's visit, something like: "In 1937, photojournalist Arthur Rothstein visited Gee's Bend and later published a series of sensitive portraits of the people who lived there." That way, the first sentence of the third paragraph works as a transition sentence. Jzimba (talk) 18:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Additional photos
[edit]I came across this photo on Wikipedia Commons. There's also a cropped version. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)