Talk:Gedser–Rostock bridge

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think they should build both bridges -- 213.39.231.199 (talk) 00:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on that. Norway and Sweden should offer to pay for 25%.--Kjello (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Continuous growth?

It would appear to me that some statements in this article are based on outdated information. First, East Central Europe is no longer a high growth region, at least for the time being. Second, the "continuous growth" of traffic along this route. Any figures about that? The Fehmarn belt ferries go every 30 minutes or so while the Gedser-Rostock line is serviced only every two hours. I think this indicates that the Puttgarden-Rødby link is still the far more important one. --Johannes Rohr (talk) 08:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gedser–Rostock Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090722152551/http://www.bmvbs.de/-,302.1000913/Tiefensee-Durchbruch-fuer-fest.htm to http://www.bmvbs.de/-,302.1000913/Tiefensee-Durchbruch-fuer-fest.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]