Jump to content

Talk:Gazeta Polska

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV

[edit]

Adam Michnik is in ideological dispute with Gazeta Polska and Michnik is not neutral scholar of journalism so his opinions are not neutral and shouldn`t be spread in article. Mathiasrex (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The references to Adam Michnik and Patrick H. O'Neil represent their own point of view, rather than neutral assessments of categories the paper belongs to. Both, 'far-right' and 'sensational' are commonly viewed as negative attributes, and therefore indicate a bias in the article. What is more, neither Adam Michnik nor Patick H. O'Neil are recognized as authorities in the field of Polish journalism to the extend which would entitle them to expressed views regarded as neutral. One could find a number of references to a variety of authors describing the paper in ways far more favorable, with credentials not less recognized that those of Michnik and O'Neil. As the aim of Wikipedia is to inform the reader and express a neutral, unbiased point of view, it seems only natural that there should be no place for personal opinions (positive as much as negative), or controversial remarks that are not universally recognized as neutral.--Eximun (talk) 14:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michnik's and O'Neil's views have been removed, the POV problem is solved. It is, however, not a matter of POV to mention different neutral opinions about the newspaper's political orientation. HerkusMonte (talk) 14:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really think that this newspaper is far-right They are not chauvinst,racist ,antisemitic or ultranationalist so they didn't qualify.

We use reliable sources. Geneviève Zubrzycki and the Time magazine use the term "far-right". HerkusMonte (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gazeta Polska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent additions

[edit]

The recent additions did not provide any source [1] , I restored the last version before. Feel free to add again based on WP:Reliable Sources. HerkusMonte (talk) 16:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POV (edits made by FilipKotler)

[edit]

The article says "LGBT-Free Zone sticker was a protest by a 'Gazeta Polska' against censorship. It was a defence of people who do not agree with the LGBT ideology." -BonsMans1 𝑇𝐶 09:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war resolution

[edit]

-BonsMans1 𝑇𝐶 09:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The recent additions [2] by FilipKotler were directly copied from the Gazeta Polska homepage [3], a blatant violation of WP:COPYRIGHT. Unfortunately FilipKotler is not even trying to discuss anything at all. HerkusMonte (talk) 08:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]