A fact from Gavrilița Cabinet appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 August 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: The article is new and long enough. Sourcing is OK, sample check from Romanian/Moldovan/whatever has not revealed any obvious plagiarism; the article seems to be balanced. As for the hook, the first version of the hook seems very risky: when you sort the table in Wikipedia by countries, it appears that Finland had a female PM and a female President in 2010-11 (and it is a republic), now so does Estonia, and, since a week or so, Moldova (there's one more thing: what are we going to do with Switzerland/San Marino, where a collective head of state/government is in place?) Therefore, I can either agree on ALT1, as it is cited, or a slightly changed version of ALT0:
That is when it comes to the DYK review, which you basically passed in all but hook choice (remember to start doing DYK reviews, though, because you've now used up all your "free" QPQ credits, this is 5th). I'd note, however, that since the event is recent, I think you could (have) ask(ed) for review at the In the news section, which would appear for longer and probably attract more attention (not that I propose to do that just now, because after 3-4 days, the event might be considered already not news). Remember, though, that that would probably require some more work on the Gavrilița Cabinet article or the list, which has a "Multiple issues" template, and AFAIK a DYK item and an ITN item on the same topic can't really appear. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 09:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! For your review and your comment as well. I agree with your ALT suggestion, because, although it was not my intention, the first version of the hook might be misread. Perhaps ALT0a is better. I tried to nominate this fact here (without empathising the feminist aspect, I have no idea how InTheNews project works) - Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#(Closed)_Prime_Minister_of_Moldova, but failed --Andrei (talk) 10:20, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Andrew J.Kurbiko, I got you, in that case, I'll shorten the the ALT0a to make it under 200 characters. Confirm (200 characters exactly):