Talk:Gatwick Handling

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted because I have just started writing it and am planning to add all relevant details (citations, categories etc) tomorrow. The article is of relevance as it links to the Dan-Air, Laker Airways and Aviance articles (explaining the background, ie business case and rationale, for these airlines to establish their own ground handling agent who also worked for other parties using their main base at Gatwick), and I have just come across relevant source material I am planning to include tomorrow (citations, references, external links etc) tomorrow. The sources really explains all this very well. So, please be patient and wait for me to finish the article. Anyway, I really find it difficult to understand why you guys want to jump the gun and nominate an article that has just started for speedy deletion without waiting to see the end result first?! — Devanahalli2008 (talk) 00:24, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]