Talk:Gates of Heaven Synagogue

Gates of Heaven Synagogue has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 11, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Gates of Heaven Synagogue appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the oldest surviving synagogue building in Wisconsin was almost razed in the 1970s?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gates of Heaven Synagogue.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 16:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Gates of Heaven Synagogue, Madison, Wisconsin

... that the oldest surviving synagogue building (pictured) in Wisconsin was almost razed in the 1970s? Source: Weisiger, Marsha. Esperdy, Gabrielle; Kingsley, Karen (eds.). "Historic Shaare Shomaim Synagogue (Gates of Heaven Synagogue)". SAH Archipedia. Society of Architectural Historians. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
- Reviewed: no QPQ necessary; this is my 2nd DYK nomination.

5x expanded by Vami IV (talk) and Sawyer-mcdonell (talk). Nominated by Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) at 23:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gates of Heaven Synagogue; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Note: added a preexisting source to the sentence where claim is made in article, otherwise good. 5x expanded, QPQ unnecessary, interesting hook, no copyvio. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 02:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gates of Heaven Synagogue/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chilicave (talk · contribs) 20:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interested to review this article over the next few days!

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

A beautifully written article. I was quite impressed with the fact that the article was written like one big timeline (something I can learn from). Deserves a pass.

Thanks so much for your review !!! This was a big project and a whole lot of fun to research, so I'm glad you enjoyed the article :) sawyer * he/they * talk 04:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]