Talk:Gary Schmitt
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gary Schmitt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Gary Schmitt be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Biased views on the US military Industrial Complex
[edit]Gary Schmitt is very biased when talking about US arms production and the USMIC. Asking him questions about it results in a pro-USMIC response or a response to tone down criticism of it. This can be clearly seen in his recent CSpan interview. It should be added that he definitely has this pro-military slant. It is his area of focus but in reality, he should not be so openly biased and should not be considered an expert on the political aspects of the subject of the military. He should be objective.