Talk:Garret Smith
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Garrett Smith (writer))
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Garret Smith appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the best novel of American science fiction author Garrett Smith did not appear as a stand-alone book until over 60 years after his death? Source: https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/smith_garret ; see this and other sources for praise for Treasures of Tantalus which didn't appear in print (it was originally serialized in a magazine in 1920) until 2017
Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 06:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Stub or start?
[edit]Since there's some disagreement, I'll ask for input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography. IMHO this is not a stub as it is (yes, barely) over the 250 words/1500 characters of prose treshold, and it is comprehensive (with regards to sources known - there is nothing more in these sources to add here). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Personally I'd say it's just about a "Start", though with slightly more content and some sections it would definitely be start-class. ORES also predicts "start" at almost 69%. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Kj cheetham Thanks. I'd add more but the sources I have access to are very, very bare. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles