Jump to content

Talk:Gargantuavis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

I mean, that reconstruction it uses has features it shares with modern birds, such as having a beak, having a tailfan of feathers, lacking hands (which can be only found on primitive birds, though they probably would've had short and weak fingers). Having it outside of the modern bird group is a product of its uncertain classification. it's like how we treated Vegavis iaai as a primitive bird at one point, but it's now classified as a modern bird.

Gargantuavis philoinos also would've had a similar look to Asteriornis maastrichtensis. like Asteriornis, it walked similarly to it, except that Asteriornis maastrichtensis probably had the ability to fly, and Gargantuavis philoinos didn't.

Note that this is my opinion on the classification. Spinnerabc (talk) 10:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]