This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
There were four documented daughters: Elvira (makes a donation in April 1182 mentioning her parents and grandfather); Mayor, Sancha and María, all three mentioned in a charter in the Monastery of Arlanza on 8 february 1141, confirming a document of Rodrigo Glz de Lara una cum consanguineis meis domna Sancia Garcíaz, domna Maior Garciez, domna María Garcíez, plus Petro Garciez. --Maragm (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to know why people are reverting my edit of adding details about his Children. It seems strange because often these details are not cited at all in Wikipedia articles and I am providing a solid source. The people who are doing the reverting of the edits, have you checked the source? It is very reliable it cites everything and includes quotations from primary sources. "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications." The person who wrote this is clearly an expert in the field and anyone who reads this source should know that. Also there are several sentences in this article which are not cited at all, should I delete them then? --Tgec17 (talk) 05:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, your source[1] fails in a least two ways. Who is the author? Who published this work?
"A source is where the material comes from. For example, a source could be a book or a webpage. A source can be reliable or unreliable for the material it is meant to support. Some sources, such as unpublished texts and an editor's own personal experience, are prohibited.
When editors talk about sources that are being cited on Wikipedia, they might be referring to any one of these three concepts:
The piece of work itself (the article, book)
The creator of the work (the writer, journalist)
The publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press)
Any of the three can affect reliability. Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both. These qualifications should be demonstrable to other people."
