This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
The lead is very thin. Include some production details.
The sentence with Alan Sepinwall should be removed. You should summarize what all critics said about the episode (Critics reacted ____ to the episode).
In the reception section, the use of the word "episode" is very redundant. Use some variety (ie. it, "Garage Sale").
I think the cultural references section should be merged with the production section. It would make the article look more organized.
In the production section, "New York" should be italicized.
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
The one non-free file is tagged appropriately with a fair-use rational.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
I will put the nomination on hold for 7 days.
Took another look at other good articles of The Office. The lead is fine, and everything seems in order. I will now pass it. :) —DAP388 (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
