Talk:Gannon and Hands

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page title

I chose to make this page for the firm rather than do individual pages for the two founders because information on their lives is so hard to come by. Page created in honor of Women's History Month. Alafarge (talk) 03:41, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Buildings

It would be good to nail down location, name, and history for some of their buildings, especially the San Francisco hospital and the women's club building in New York (which may have doubled as a residential building).Alafarge (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

separation

I'm glad you, @Alafarge:, put so much work into this page! But I do wonder if we should separate them. Schenck & Mead are separate Marcia Mead and Anna P. Schenck. Of course the Charles and Ray Eames are still not. Please let me know if it's okay for me to ake a stab at this at some point, cheers! Fred (talk) 00:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frederika Eilers:: It's not my call, really— you are entirely within your rights to make pages for each of the partners— though I think it's a fine idea, and I hope you can dig up some more material on each of them. I do think it would be good to keep a separate page for the firm as well, since it is not the same thing as the individual partners. "Schenck & Mead" redirects logically enough to Mead because Schenck died so early in the partnership, but it wouldn't be possible to redirect "Gannon & Hands" to one partner without slighting the other. Cheers, Alafarge (talk) 22:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. I've come across more examples, as i've been thinking about this. There are plenty of contemporary firms which only feature a firm article and not individual partners, ie. Diller Scofidio + Renfro. I don't really think there is a consensus yet. I've asked if Merrill Elam from Mack Scogin Merrill Elam should be deleted, so maybe i'll get a response as to our standard. Anyway, thanks again for all the work you did to initially create the article! Fred (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't come across any consensus on how to treat partnerships in any field (tho it is certainly possible that guidelines exist somewhere in the bowels of Wikipedia's style guides and I just haven't stumbled across them). I appreciate that you are working on architects, a big subject. Alafarge (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]